We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A brutal, repressive regime creates what Vaclav Havel (1991: 391) calls a ‘contaminated moral environment’ where both state and society are scarred by violence, fear and inhumanity. The consolidation of a new democracy burdened with such a legacy thus requires the creation of ‘[…] a new type of society, a new form of politics, and a new kind of people’ (Parlevliet, 1998: 174), which in turn requires dual processes of the democratization of state and civil society. There is a near-global consensus that this demands a reckoning of some kind with the past, but what form this should take is controversial.
There are two core elements of such a reckoning. The first is the creation of an account of the past, in order to establish a historical record, or a collective memory, of the atrocities committed. In his novel The Book of Laughter and Forgetting, Milan Kundera (1980: 3) writes that ‘the struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting’, and the creation of a public memory of past abuse of power is indeed seen as a weapon against future abuse of power. The second element relates to dealing with the perpetrators of the atrocities, and this is the more controversial part of the process. Strategies range along a continuum with the prosecution of perpetrators at the one end and blanket amnesty at the other, and a number of other options in between.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.